Release the Impregnated Goblins

SAVE THE BURN BAGS FOR WHEN THE SHREDDER NEEDS A BREAK. Tuesday is the day the order goes out to shred the documents in USAID. This is something that normally happens when an embassy is about to be overrun. Well, it is being overrun only the embassy is the U.S. Embassy and all its affiliates. Trump's Burger King crown is just the goofy window dressing, hardly the goal. Keeps getting called chaotic when, if you look in Project 2025 you see it a step by step plan that has been followed. Well, ok Project 2025 doesn't say anything about selling Guam to settle the national debt as Elon tweeted but the rest is all there.

Folks can’t believe the goal printed in Project 2025. Tariffs are only a small part of the plan. He has declared an emergency that already gives him all the attributes of a dictator. Don’t blame people for not believing the plan. It’s preposterous…it is also far along.

From the Alt National Forest Service

It concludes with the idea that this is about expanding the power of the executive branch without saying that that is in order to change our form of government. It is an adult dose nonetheless:

Alt National Park Service

We know this post is long, but it’s important to read to understand what’s going on. A lot of people are asking, “Why is Trump just out golfing while things are falling apart?” It’s simple: the emergency isn’t something he’s reacting to — it’s something he’s building.

Trump recently declared a national economic emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — granting himself sweeping authority over international trade by labeling foreign economic practices an “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

But here’s the real play: by declaring a national emergency, Trump didn’t just respond to a crisis — he created one. And in doing so, he unlocked access to over 120 statutory powers scattered throughout federal law. Many of these powers have nothing to do with trade — and everything to do with expanding presidential authority inside the U.S.

What This Move Enables: Expanded Domestic Powers

1. Control of Domestic Communications

- 47 U.S.C. §606(c): Allows the president to take control of, shut down, or regulate wire and radio communications — including the internet, social media platforms, broadcast networks, and telecom infrastructure — in the name of national defense. Originally intended for wartime, this Cold War-era law remains on the books.

2. Asset Freezing and Financial Surveillance

- Under IEEPA and related laws, the president can freeze the assets and bank accounts of individuals or organizations accused of aiding foreign threats. These powers are vague and can be stretched to include domestic political groups, journalists, or activists — especially if they’re perceived as having foreign ties or influence.

3. Domestic Military Deployment

- Under the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255), the president can deploy active-duty U.S. military to enforce laws or suppress civil unrest within the country. In certain scenarios, this can be done without state governor consent — especially if the president claims state authorities are failing to uphold federal law.

4. Emergency Detention Powers (Non-Citizens)

- The Alien Enemies Act (50 U.S.C. §21) — a law dating back to 1798 — allows the president to detain or restrict the movement of non-citizens from nations deemed hostile. The criteria for “hostile” can be broad and undefined during a declared emergency.

5. Control of Energy and Transportation

- Under laws like 42 U.S.C. §6272 and others, the president can redirect or restrict domestic fuel production, electricity usage, or energy transportation. Additionally, 49 U.S.C. §40106(b) allows the president to limit, reroute, or suspend civil aviation, giving the executive branch near-total control over U.S. airspace in a crisis.

6. Suspension of Labor Regulations

- During a declared emergency, the president can waive federal labor regulations and override contract protections. This includes removing limits on hours, wages, and workplace safety for federal contractors and any industries deemed vital to national security.

7. National Security Letters & Warrantless Surveillance

- Emergency declarations expand the reach and use of National Security Letters (NSLs) — tools that let federal agencies demand financial, telecom, and internet records without a warrant. These also come with gag orders, preventing the recipient (e.g., Google or a bank) from disclosing that they’re under surveillance.

Why it Matters?

Even when legal domestic powers are limited, a national emergency lets the president:

- Frame the issue as a national security crisis, justifying aggressive action

- Bypass Congress and the courts by acting unilaterally

- Sway public opinion using fear, urgency, and patriotic rhetoric

Bottom Line

IEEPA is focused on foreign threats — but once the emergency is declared, the president taps into a hidden arsenal of domestic control powers. What began as a trade issue could quickly shift into civil liberties restrictions, mass surveillance, or even crackdowns under the legal shield of an “emergency.”

This isn’t just about tariffs. It’s about redefining the boundaries of executive power. Imagine if this economic crisis keeps getting worse — the amount of power he will gain.

Most of the reporting treats it as a business or economic deal when it is spelled out in the so called Dark Enlightenment spiel by Yarvin and put into action by Thiel and the Heritage Foundation. Vance is the sign who is running the show. It reads like a Superman Comic script...destroy the country and have Cyber Lords take over. A lot of the terms and language dates back to he publication of the Mandate [1.4% in the current case] for Leadership in 1981. This is all that I could gather before it gave me a headache

https://static.project2025.org/

there is a permalink to their pdf

Right at the beginning, it's straight to the library and the drag. queens "...children suffer the toxic normalization of transgender- ism with drag queens and pornography invading their school libraries.

It was in early 1979—amid stagflation, gas lines, and the Red Army’s inva- sion of Afghanistan, the nadir of Jimmy Carter’s days of malaise—that Heritage launched the Mandate for Leadership project.

this is from Gemini...I got lazy...well it is 900 pages: "Based on the search results, "Project 2025" and related discussions extensively cover the topic of tariffs, particularly in the context of potential future trade policies. Here's a breakdown of key points:

* Focus on Reciprocal Tariffs:(so this is where Trump learned that word...even more exotic than 'groceries')

* A significant aspect involves the concept of "reciprocal tariffs," where the U.S. would impose tariffs that match those levied by other countries on U.S. goods.

This is a core part of the trade policy discussions related to Project 2025. �

We brought together hundreds of conservative scholars and academics across the conservative movement. Together, this team created a 20-volume, 3,000-page governing handbook containing more than 2,000 conservative policies to reform the federal government and rescue the American people from Washington dysfunction. It was a promise from the conservative movement to the country—confident, specific, and clear.

Other than 'dismantle the administrative state' the rest of this is the nice way of saying something else.

1.Restore the family as the centerpiece of American life and protect our children. [punch down on non traditional families]

2. Dismantle the administrative state and return self-governance to the American people. [get rid of all this stuff about climate, windmills, regulations about dumping stuff in the river for instance]

3. Defend our nation’s sovereignty, borders, and bounty against global threats. [immigrants..make life hard for them]

4. Secure our God-given individual rights to live freely—what our Constitution calls “the Blessings of Liberty.” [fill in the blank with your favorite]

This starts with deleting the terms sexual orientation and gender identity (“SOGI”), diversity, equity, and inclusion

oy vey, here we go

(“DEI”), gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensi- tive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.

[ed. I fail to see how this relates to the First Amendment. Could it be the 'including "them" is "excluding" "us" the way if "they" can marry it effects "my" marriage? Is this seen as a barrier against speaking out against "these people"?

One of the executive orders claims gender is assigned at conception. It isn't and without implantation it is washed out during the period. Worse, we are all female...six weeks later one of the many variations of the boy girls story happens. Even the Talmud accounts for eight genders.]

https://globalupdate.substack.com/.../pundits-everywhere...

All the familiar names. Odd lack of anything positive, no icing on this cake. https://www.aclu.org/.../2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf]